China—Africa media relations
Author: Suzanne Franks, Kate Ribet.
Franks, Suzanne and Ribet, Kate. 2009. "China—Africa media relations." Global Media and Communication 5 (1): 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766508101318
The international economic upheaval of 2008 has led many to ask more
searching questions about the role of China and other ‘BRICs’ (Brazil,
Russia, India and China) in the global economic context. The role and
influence of China in the contemporary development of Africa has
become a topic of wide significance. Sino-African diplomatic and
economic relations have expanded dramatically in the last decade in
response to the Chinese economy’s growing need for energy and
commodities, as well as validation of its global ascendancy. For many
observers the distinctive Chinese approach to large parts of the African
continent, which differs so markedly from current Western attitudes and
initiatives, raises new and interesting questions. In response to this, a
number of scholarly enquiries have focused on this growing relationship,
the majority of which derive from a political economy or foreign policy
perspective.
1
These embrace a wide spectrum of opinion within which China’s
current intervention in Africa is either a reinvention of old style
colonialism, or exploitation, or a refreshing new kind of geopolitical
relationship, which is helping African development, free of the
constraints often attached to Western aid. Criticism of China has come
from a right-wing American perspective that interprets Chinese economic
expansion as a threat to US interests. Yet there are also those on the left
who are hostile towards China’s apparent willingness to ignore human
rights abuse and argue that the Chinese cynically use development aid to
‘buy’ support from despotic leaders. Darfur and Zimbabwe are typically
cited as prime examples of this. Meanwhile other voices applaud the
pragmatic and effective nature of Chinese backing for African economic
development. They argue that it is single-handedly doing more to
improve living standards than years of well-meaning aid projects and
efforts towards liberal democratic practices, thereby rejecting much of
the criticism as a paternalistic hangover from colonial times.Published: April 1, 2009Typ: journalArticleISSN: 1742-7665