China’s Interest and Activity in Africa’s Construction and Infrastructure Sectors
Author: Center for Chinese Studies.
Center for Chinese Studies, . November 2006. "China’s Interest and Activity in Africa’s Construction and Infrastructure Sectors." 110. Stellenbosch: https://www.icafrica.org/fileadmin/documents/Knowledge/DFID/China%E2%80%99s%20Interest%20and%20Activity%20in%20Africa%E2%80%99s%20Infrastructure%20and%20Construction%20Sectors.pdf
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) has become an
important and influential player in Africa and is
increasingly a source of political and financial su
pport for many African governments, particularly in
countries with economies that are resource-endowed.
A number of incentives drive China’s commercial
engagement with Africa. Principal among these is Ch
ina’s increasing need for energy sources and raw
materials to fuel its rapidly growing economy.
Another motivation has been the need to develop new
markets for Chinese goods. Except for the relativ
ely
small number of resource-rich countries such as Ang
ola and Zambia, the majority of African economies
have mounting trade deficits with China. The Chine
se have sought to offset these deficits with more
favourable terms of trade for African products and
the provision of aid in the form of infrastructure
development.
China’s involvement in Africa’s construction and in
frastructure sectors has proved most effective in b
uilding
relations with African governments - increasing inf
luence and expanding access to natural resources on
the
continent. Chinese state-owned and private compani
es are making strategic inroads into the constructi
on
and infrastructure sectors in many African economie
s at the expense of European and South African
companies. Naturally, the traditional actors are a
larmed by this phenomenon with concerns that China’
s
politically determined business models do little to
build local capacity.
The Centre for Chinese Studies conducted a four-cou
ntry research study that evaluated the market entry
models of Chinese construction firms in Angola, Sie
rra Leone, Tanzania and Zambia. Particular attentio
n
was paid to their methods of engagement and impact
on the local construction industries. Chinese acti
vity
in the four case studies was examined and compared
across five areas: 1) tendering, 2) access to capit
al,
3) labour, 4) procurement, and 5) quality of workma
nship. The business environment, in terms of
governmental bilateral relations, aid, trade and in
vestment profiles between China and the countries
concerned were also taken into consideration.
The success of China’s companies, particularly stat
e-owned enterprises (SOEs), can be attributed to
several factors: cost competitiveness in overall bi
dding price; access to cheap capital through Chines
e
state-owned banks; access to skilled low cost labou
r; access to cheap building materials through suppl
y
chains from China; and political support from the C
hinese government channelled through Chinese
embassies and Economic and Commercial Counsels in t
he respective African countries.
Chinese companies were found to rarely compete with
indigenous construction companies, which usually
lack the capacity for large scale construction proj
ects, in the initial stage of their engagement in a
n African
country. They were also usually found to employ la
rge numbers of local labour. Despite the potential
benefits in terms of skill and technology transfer,
the Chinese have shown only limited interest in
collaborative ventures with local construction comp
anies due to their low levels of human capital,
technological proficiency and problems with the fin
ance and management. Instead, foreign firms were
found to be the preferred partners for joint-ventur
es and are also attractive candidates for sub-contr
acts on
contracts won by Chinese companies.
While political support from the Chinese government
has undoubtedly played a critical role in facilita
ting the
entry of Chinese companies, it was found that they
faced the same challenges as other construction
players: corruption, lack of infrastructure, poor q
uality of local labour, communication and political
instability.
Despite widespread perceptions that their quality o
f work is inferior, the study showed that when buil
ding
codes and regulations are in place and effectively
enforced, the standard of work done by the Chinese
was
reported by the majority of stakeholders to be very
high. However, where quality controls are not pro
perly
enforced, especially in less developed markets such
as Sierra Leone, standards are often low.
The contribution of Chinese companies to the develo
pment and rebuilding of infrastructure in Africa is
considerable; however, to maximize these benefits i
mproved monitoring and evaluation mechanisms are
required. As China increases its profile in Africa
, further dialogue on these issues involving all st
akeholders
is crucial.Published: November 2006Typ: report